Aaby v. Strange
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DROWOTA, Justice.
In this child custody dispute, Judy E. Strange, the custodial parent, appeals from the Court of Appeals’ affirmance of the trial *624court’s order denying her permission to move out-of-state with her child. The sole issue for our determination is whether the lower courts properly interpreted the principles enunciated in Taylor v. Taylor, 849 S.W.2d 819 (Tenn.1993) in deciding this case. For the reasons set forth below, we conclude that the lower courts did not do so; therefore, we reverse the judgment.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Judy E. Strange and Gene V. Aaby were…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Evans v. EvansTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
- Walker v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1983
- Nichols v. NicholsTennessee Supreme Court · 1990
- Seessel v. SeesselTennessee Supreme Court · 1988
- Rogero v. PittTennessee Supreme Court · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ireland v. IrelandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Kaiser v. KaiserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Cassidy Lynne Aragon v. Reynaldo Manuel AragonTennessee Supreme Court · 2017
- Aaby v. StrangeTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
- Byron Black v. Frank Strada, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Tennessee Department of CorrectionTennessee Supreme Court · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.