A.D.S. v. State
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
John Mauzy Pittman, Chief Judge.
The appellant in this juvenile delinquency case was found delinquent by reason of possession of an instmment of crime, a methamphetamine pipe. On appeal, she argues that the trial court erred in denying her motion for a directed verdict based on insufficiency of the evidence. We affirm without reaching the merits of her argument because it is not properly before us.
At the hearing on this matter, appellant’s attorney moved for a directed verdict without specifying any grounds. The motion was denied, and the trial judge proceeded to argument. Although appellant…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Raymond v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- McClina v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- J.R. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
3Cited by4 opinions
- N.L. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2017
- N.L. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2017
- ADS v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007
- N.L. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2017