Legal Opinion

United States v. Portillo-Saravia

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided May 10, 2019No. CRIMINAL NO. 4:18-0650PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NANCY F. ATLAS, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court are Defendants Jose Blademir Portillo-Saravia's ("Portillo") and Jose Efrain Mateo's ("Mateo") Motions to *607Suppress and Request for Evidentiary Hearing ("Motions to Suppress" or "Motions") [Docs. # 24, # 25]. The Government filed a response,1 the Court held a two-day evidentiary hearing,2 and the parties submitted supplemental briefing.3 The Motions are now ripe for decision. Based on the evidence and testimony introduced at the hearing, the parties' briefing, counsels' arguments, and pertinent legal authority, the Court…

2Cases cited69 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hankins v. WheelerDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2023
  2. Washington v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API