Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Bourne

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1993No. 93-102Published

1DissentJustice Trieweiler

I dissent from the opinion of the majority.

As this Court pointed out in State v. Mazurkiewicz (1990), 245 Mont. 172, 177, 799 P.2d 1066, 1070:

Section 46-18-242, MCA, clearly states that restitution may be a proper condition of a deferred, suspended or partially suspended sentence. No statute allows restitution requirements to be imposed in the absence of these sentences.

Actually, restitution is authorized when sentences are deferred or suspended by § 46-18-201(l)(a) and (b), MCA. Section 46-18-242, MCA, simply describes the information which must be included in the presentence investigation…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. KlippensteinMontana Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. MazurkiewiczMontana Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. ToddMontana Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API