Legal Opinion
M. Ullman v. Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided March 3, 2015No. 14-2025UnpublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION *
2Per curiam
M. Robert Ullman, proceeding pro se, appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania awarding attorneys’ fees to Joseph Jones and his law firm, Williamson, Friedberg & Jones. We will affirm.
In September 2013; Ullman filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania arising from a dispute with Jones, his former attorney. This dispute has been the subject of numerous, unsuccessful state and federal actions filed by Ullman. See In re Canoe Mfg., Co., Inc., 466 B.R. 251, 253-54…
3Cases cited11 opinions
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Smith v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Joseph Nara v. Frederick FrankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Catherine M. Loughner v. The University Of PittsburghCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Rode v. DellarcipreteCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- Lynch v. DonnellyDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2025
- Marianne Sawicki v. Richard A. Wilson, et al.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2026
- Mark Vitalis v. Sun Constructors, Inc.District Court, Virgin Islands · 2024
- Mark Vitalis v. Sun Constructors, Inc.District Court, Virgin Islands · 2024