Harris v. SOHA

Appellant, Lana Harris, raises a number of issues concerning the propriety of the trial court’s order granting appellees’ motion for directed verdict. We find no merit in the appeal. However, two .issues raised by appellant warrant discussion. Ms. Harris argues that the trial court erred in finding that section 768.13(2)(c)(l), Florida Statutes (2004), was applicable because (1) Dr. Soha was not visiting a patient of his practice when he responded to her husband, and (2) his response was not voluntary.

Ms. Harris brings this action as a personal representative of the estate of her husband,…