Legal Opinion

Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. Stierwalt

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 27, 1926No. 12,400PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcMahan, P. J.

This is an action for damages under the Federal Employers' Liability Act, alleging injuries to the person of appellee while employed by appellant as a brakeman on one of appellant's trains at Clear Creek, Indiana, January 22, 1923. The complaint is in a single paragraph, but contains two charges of alleged negligence. First, the use by appellant of a car, the coupler and coupling apparatus of which wás “broken, defective and inoperative and in such condition that said car could not be coupled onto an adjoining car without the necessity of someone going between the ends of said cars” in…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. RigsbySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Barry v. EdmundsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. San Antonio & Aransas Pass Railway Co. v. WagnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1916

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. CHICAGO, M., ST. P. & PRR CO. v. LinehanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  2. Samuel E. Pentecost Construction Co. v. O'DonnellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942
  3. King v. RansburgIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942
  4. King's Indiana Billiard Co. v. WintersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1952
  5. Highshew v. KushtoIndiana Court of Appeals · 1956

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API