Legal Opinion

Blatt v. Blatt

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 2, 1925No. 11,129PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison

The defendant in error moves to strike the bill of excep tions on three grounds: (1) That the court allowed thirty-days for the bill, and that it was tendered and settled by the court-not in thirty but in fifty days. (2) That the signature of the court to the bill was made “subject to the approval of McDonough & McDonough, attorneys,” and that McDonough and McDonough have never approved it. (3) That the bill was never “lodged” with the clerk of the district court in conformity with rule 26 of that court.

Upon the first point, the code of 1921, § 420, expressly gives sixty days for a bill of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Iowa Gold Mining Co. v. DiefenthalerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1904

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ernst v. ColburnSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API