Legal Opinion

Krohn v. Judicial Magistrate Appointing Commission

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 17, 1976No. 2-57182PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRIS, Justice.

The controlling question in this appeal is whether the soldiers preference act applies to the appointment of judicial magistrates. If not the parties agree the action of the trial court must be affirmed. We hold the act has no such application and affirm the trial court. In doing so we pass other serious questions raised by the judicial magistrate appointing commission (the commission) and addressed to the sufficiency of petitioner’s assertions.

Frank Krohn, Jr. (petitioner) applied for the office of full time magistrate in Jasper County. Another candidate was appointed to the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. J. P. Cullen & Son Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1972
  2. Kelly v. BrewerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  3. Stover v. Central Broadcasting CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
  4. Geyer v. TriplettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946
  5. Tusant v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. DeVoss v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
  2. Hawkeye Foodservice Distribution, Inc. v. Iowa Educators CorporationSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
  3. Midwest Management Corp. v. StephensSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  4. Warren County v. Judges of the Fifth Judicial District of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  5. Stammeyer v. Division of Narcotics Enforcement of the Iowa Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Iowa · 2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API