Legal Opinion

Luke v. Luke

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 20, 1923No. 3316PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.

1. In response to the petition of the husband for a divorce, the wife filed an answer and a petition for alimony, temporary and permanent, and for counsel fees, in one cross-action. “ A petition for alimony pending a divorce suit or a suit for permanent alimony is in the nature of an ancillary proceeding, and does not require the issuance and service of a new process returnable to another term of court. Upon it the presiding judge issues an order nisi which is served and under which the hearing is had.” Nipper v. Nipper, 129 Ga. 450 (3) (59 S. E. 226); Williams v. Williams, 137 Ga. 791 (74 S.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hogan v. HoganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
  2. Legg v. LeggSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
  3. Nipper v. NipperSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  4. Glover v. GloverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  5. Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Harrison v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
  2. Luke v. LukeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
  3. Brown v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
  4. Adams v. AdamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  5. Legg v. LeggSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API