Legal Opinion
Arnett v. City of Mobile
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided February 24, 1984No. 82-834PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Plaintiffs Freeman and Mary Arnett appeal from a summary judgment in favor of the City of Mobile. We reverse and remand.
The Arnetts are real estate developers. In a period extending from 1967 to 1977, they developed an area known as Theodore Highlands outside the corporate limits of the City of Mobile but within the City's subdivision jurisdiction. This development was conducted in stages or additions, with each addition requiring a separate plat approved by the City of Mobile Planning Commission. As a prerequisite to approval of plats for the Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, and Eighth Additions, the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF JAMES CITY CTY. v. RoweSupreme Court of Virginia · 1975
- Powell v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
- Boulder Corp. v. VannSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
- Highland Realty Co. v. Avondale Land Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1911
- Lynnwood Property Owners v. Lands DescribedSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Crw, Inc. v. Twin Lakes Property Owners Asso., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Hereford v. Gingo-Morgan ParkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Harper v. CoatsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
- Hardy v. SmithCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2013
- City of Centreville v. WhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.