Legal Opinion · Dissent

Parrish v. Jessee

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided November 3, 1995No. Record 950044Published

1Dissent

SENIOR JUSTICE POFF,

with whom JUSTICE STEPHENSON joins, dissenting.

I dissent from the decision reached by the majority.

This Court has consistently held that judgments and orders may be valid in part and void in part. See, e.g., Barnes v. American Fert. Co., 144 Va. 692, 714, 130 S.E. 902, 909 (1925); White v. Palmer, 110 Va. 490, 496, 66 S.E. 44, 46 (1909); Wade et als. v. Hancock and Agee, 76 Va. 620, 625-26 (1882). In her Motion for Partial Vacation filed at trial, Jessee contended that the Richmond court’s order approving the compromise settlement was, in part, “void as a matter of law.”…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Barnes v. American Fertilizer Co.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 1925
  2. Rook v. RookSupreme Court of Virginia · 1987
  3. Wade v. Hancock & AgeeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1882
  4. Coleman v. Virginia Stave & Heading Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1911
  5. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API