Legal Opinion
Nichols v. United States
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided February 24, 1971No. Civ. A. T-4761PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION OF DEFENDANTS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
TEMPLAR, District Judge.
Plaintiff is a physician duly licensed in Kansas to practice as such and, for the purpose of considering the motion filed by defendants to dismiss or in the alternative for summary judgment, is presumably a qualified pathologist with experience in examining gunshot wounds including their interpretation by X-ray. Plaintiff has instituted this action against the United States of America, the Archivist of the United States, the General Services Administration and the Secretary of the Navy.
The action is brought under…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Consumers Union of United States, Inc. v. Veterans AdministrationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- MacHinery Center, Inc. And the Continental Bank and Trust Company v. Anchor National Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
3Cited by22 opinions
- Kissinger v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Fielding M. McGehee III v. Central Intelligence AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Hudgins v. Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1985
- Cook v. CraigCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- John Nichols v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.