Legal Opinion

Bliss v. Smith

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 18, 1926PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHouck, J.

This is an error proceeding, and comes into this court from the common pleas court of Muskingum county.

S. B. Bliss, the plaintiff, took judgment on a cognovit note, claiming to be the owner and holder thereof against Daisy A. Cook Smith, the defend ant, in the common pleas court of Muskingum county. The defendant filed a motion to set aside said judgment upon a number of grounds stated therein. The cause was submitted to the trial judge upon said motion, and without any evidence being offered in the hearing.

The trial judge sustained the motion and set aside the judgment and held it for…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Snyder v. DavisonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
  2. Brown v. State Printing BoardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
  3. Dayton Morris Plan Bank v. GrahamOhio Court of Appeals · 1934
  4. Kahn's Jewelers v. TrussOhio Court of Appeals · 1960
  5. Dayton Morris Plan Bank v. GrahamOhio Court of Appeals · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API