Legal Opinion
Spence-Parker v. Maryland Insurance Group
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided August 21, 1996No. Civil Action 95-1322-APublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ELLIS, District Judge.
This otherwise routine insurance coverage dispute has an unusual twist: It involves an attack on a consent judgment allegedly obtained through fraud or collusion. In addition to this question, this memorandum opinion addresses two other questions: (1) the question of coverage and (2) the question whether there is a triable issue of fact concerning the allegation that the insurer acted in bad faith in denying coverage and refusing to defend.
I
On July 29, 1992, plaintiff Trudy Spence-Parker attended a company picnic arranged by her employer at the time, AT…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Miller v. ShugartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Winn v. Aleda Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1984
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. S. L. Nusbaum & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1984
- Steil v. FLA. PHYSICIANS'INS. RECIPROCALDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Richard C. Fuisz v. Selective Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Gum v. DudleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
- Field v. Transcontinental InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1998
- Dacotah Marketing & Research, L.L.C. v. Versatility, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1998
- Sciolla v. West Bend Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- Schwartz & Schwartz of Virginia, LLC v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Who Subscribed to Policy Number NC959District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.