Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Newberry

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 17, 1994No. 2-92-0822Published

1DissentJustice Doyle

I respectfully dissent.

I completely agree with the majority’s rejection of the State’s argument that, under Sleboda, the defense must request preservation of a controlled substance as a precondition to later objecting to its destruction. The materiality of the wrecked automobile in Sleboda, which was argued to be potentially exculpatory, was a matter of legitimate dispute. This court observed that when the defense has made a timely request for preservation of certain evidence, it will be relieved of the usual burden of demonstrating that the exculpatory value of the evidence was readily…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. WardIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Eddie Griffin v. John Spratt and J. Kevin KaneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  3. United States of America, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Michael Allen Malbrough, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. Bryan McKieCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. Roy L. BartonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API