E. M. Derby & Co. v. Jackman
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Merced County. The facts are 'stated in the opinion,
1Opinion of the Court
Temple, C.
— This action was commenced against the testator of defendants. The executors having been substituted for the original defendant, plaintiffs made out and presented their claim against the estate, and then filed an amended complaint, in which no mention was made of the presentation of the claim. Some months later they filed a supplemental complaint, in which the death, probate of the will, appointment and qualification of the executors, and presentation of the claim are alleged.
After answer both to the amended and supplemental complaints, the plaintiffs moved for judgment on the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bank of Stockton v. L. L. Howland & Co.California Supreme Court · 1871
- Drake v. FosterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877
3Cited by14 opinions
- Falkner v. HendyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Cuneo v. LawsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Cass v. RochesterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Frazier v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Hawley v. KocherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.