Legal Opinion
Fitzgerald v. New York City School Construction Authority
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 31, 2005PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Schulman, J.), dated October 28, 2003, as granted that branch of the motion of the defendants New York City School Construction Authority, New York City Board of Education, and Pillar Construction, Inc., which was for summary judgment dismissing the causes of action alleging a violation of Labor Law § 241 (6) insofar as asserted against them.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ross v. Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Comes v. New York State Electric & Gas Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Rizzuto v. L.A. Wenger Contracting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Scott v. American Museum of Natural HistoryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
3Cited by4 opinions
- Aragona v. State of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Hricus v. Aurora Contractors, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Modeste v. Mega Contracting, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Martinez v. Hitachi Construction Machinery Co.New York Supreme Court · 2006