Legal Opinion

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports

Decided June 24, 1996Published

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Richard T. Farrell Secretary, Department of Business and Professional Regulation Northwood Centre, Suite 60 1940 North Monroe Street Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0750

Dear Secretary Farrell:

You ask the following question:

What action is necessary for a county to approve cardroom gaming at pari-mutuel facilities under section 849.086(16), Florida Statutes, as created by Chapter 96-364, Laws of Florida?

In sum:

Passage of an ordinance by a county approving cardroom gaming provides permanence and substantial safeguards to the public and should therefore be adopted by the Division of Pari-mutuel…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Thayer v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  2. Alsop v. PierceSupreme Court of Florida · 1944
  3. Fine v. MoranSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
  4. Certain Lots Upon Which Taxes Are Delinquent v. Town of MonticelloSupreme Court of Florida · 1947
  5. Merrill v. Dade CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API