Legal Opinion

Shanley v. Shanley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 4, 1949Published

1Opinion of the Court

On motions of this character, the relevant statutes do not make the taking of oral proof before the court or an official referee a prerequisite to the granting of relief. (Civ. Prae. Act, §§ 467, 1172-a; Judiciary Law, §§ 772, 770, 756.) Ordinarily, of course, if a dispute arises as to the material facts, it is the preferable and common practice to direct a reference to an official referee to hear and report before any final determination is made by the court. (Staehr v. Staehr, 269 App. Div. 762; Nabut v. Nabut, 271 App. Div. 935; Rolfo v. Rolfo, 271 App. Div. 892; Hendrickson v.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hendrickson v. HendricksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
  2. Myers v. MyersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  3. Staehr v. StaehrAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API