Milam v. Miss Georgia Dairies, Inc.

Quillian, Judge.

The appellant contends that the appellee through the exercise of ordinary care should have discovered *793the latent defect in the pressure gauge and its failure to do so was a violation of the provisions of Code § 66-301 which provides in part: “If there are latent defects in machinery, or dangers incident to an employment, unknown to the servant, of which the master knows or ought to know, he shall give the servant warning in respect thereto.”

With this contention we cannot agree. The plaintiff by deposition testified in part that: he had washed the tank the day before and the…