Roe v. Davis
Texas Supreme Court
Error to the Court of Civil Appeals, Sixth District, in an appeal from Bowie County. Mrs. Davis sued Boe, and had judgment for the recovery of land. Defendant appealed, and obtained writ of error on affirmance (142 S. W., 950). The trustee’s deed introduced in evidence was not copied in the record nor recitals of notice therein shown by the statement of facts.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Browy
The plaintiff in error owned the lots in controversy, which are situated in the City of Texarkana—it is unnecessary to describe them more particularly in this statement. He borrowed $675, giving his note, payable to Stewart & Rochelle, to secure which he executed and delivered to the said parties a deed of trust, wherein he appointed W. H. H. Moores as trustee, with power to sell, and with the power to appoint a substitute trustee. Subsequently, the note was transferred to Mrs. D. Davis, the defendant in error, and Moores having removed from that vicinity, R. P. Dorough was regularly…
2Cited by26 opinions
- Adams v. ZellnerTexas Supreme Court · 1916
- Vaughn v. VaughnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
- Natalia v. WitthausTexas Supreme Court · 1940
- Heiner v. Homeland Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1936
- Governmental Research Bureau, Inc. v. St. Louis CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.