Legal Opinion · Dissent

Creative Designs Tattooing Associates, Inc. v. Parrish

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided May 25, 2010No. 1431092Published

1DissentElder, J.

The majority holds that Parrish was not an employee of Creative Designs Tattooing Associates, Inc. (Creative Designs or employer), at the time of his death and, thus, his estate (claimant) is not entitled to death benefits under the Workers’ Compensation Act (the Act). I believe the evidence supports the commission’s finding that the tattoo artists working for Creative Designs—Parrish and Mark Grogan—were covered employees, making Creative Designs subject to the relevant provisions of the Act. I further agree with the commission’s finding that the assault resulting in Parrish’s death arose…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Wagner Enterprises, Inc. v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1991
  2. Baggett Transportation Co. of Birmingham v. DillonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1978
  3. R & T INVESTMENTS, LTD. v. JohnsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
  4. Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. GillSupreme Court of Virginia · 1982
  5. Bass v. City of Richmond Police DepartmentSupreme Court of Virginia · 1999

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API