Legal Opinion

McNamara v. Oakland Building & Loan Ass'n

California Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1901No. S.F. No. 1824PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County and from an order denying a. new trial. S. P. Hall, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

CHIPMAN,C.

—Action to restrain the sale of certain land under decree of foreclosure. Defendant h'ad judgment, from which and from the order denying motion for new trial this appeal is taken.

Plaintiffs are husband and wife. J. M. McNamara, being the owner of the land in question, executed a mortgage thereof to defendant’s assignor, in which his wife did not join, and McNamara failing to pay the debt secured thereby, defendant, assignee of the note and mortgage, brought its action to fore close, but did not make Mrs. McNamara a party defendant. Lis pendens was duly filed; the cause was tried,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lee v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Roach v. Riverside Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brandt v. ScribnerArizona Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Homeseekers Loan Association v. GleesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API