Legal Opinion

Kavanaugh v. Marrano/Marc Equity Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 8, 1996PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1038The court also erred in denying the cross motion of Marrano insofar as it sought contractual and common-law indemnification against third-party defendant John T. Ball, Sr., doing business as J & L Painting & Decorating Company (Ball). The record establishes that Marrano is only vicariously liable under the Labor Law and is therefore entitled to a conditional judgment based upon common-law indemnification against Ball, who actually supervised, directed and controlled the work giving rise to plaintiff’s injury (see, Chapel v Mitchell, 84 NY2d 345, 347; Gillmore v Duke/ Fluor Daniel, 221 AD2d…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brown v. Two Exchange Plaza PartnersNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Chapel v. MitchellNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Gillmore v. DanielAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. In re SavignyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Paul v. Ryan Homes, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. Clark v. 345 East 52nd St. Owners, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. Keck v. Board of Trustees of Corning Community CollegeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. Smith v. Staten Theatre GroupAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API