Swift & Co. v. Wood
Supreme Court of Virginia
Error to a judgment of the Corporation Court of the city of Newport News, on a motion to vacate a judgment, in which motion the defendants in error were the plaintiffs, and the plaintiffs in error were the defendants.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
On the 16th day of December, 1903, notice was served upon the plaintiffs in error that the defendants in error would, on the 21st day of December, 1903, move the Corporation Court of the city of Newport News to set aside and declare null and void a pretended or alleged judgment obtained by the plaintiffs in error on March 11, 1901, for $263.64 and interest.
The judgment sought to be set aside under this notice had been obtained against the defendants in error, on motion, under the proceeding provided for by section 3211 of the Code; and, among other grounds assigned for setting it aside, they…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Mangus v. McClellandSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
- Bowles v. BrauerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1892
3Cited by11 opinions
- Kelly v. TrehySupreme Court of Virginia · 1922
- Lakeside Inn Corp. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1922
- Smithie v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1924
- Anderson v. Union BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1915
- Pennington v. GillaspieWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1908
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.