Legal Opinion

Bullock v. Jackson

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 31, 1918No. 10077PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Before SeasE, J., Spartanburg, at chambers, 1918. Action by E. D. Bullock against Eemmon Jackson. From an order that plaintiff be allowed to gather his crops and deposit the proceeds with the clerk of Court, to be held subject to settlement of dispute, defendant appeals. submits: That injunction cannot be used to transfer possession of property from one to another: 27 S. C. 415; 78 S. C. 222; 88 S. C. 476; 84 S. C. 440; 35 F. R. A. (N. S.) 707, and note, and cases cited.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Gage.

The plaintiff, a tenant, sued the defendant, a landowner, to restrain the defendant from interfering with plaintiff’s entry upon land to gather the crops which the plaintiff had made' in 1917. The Circuit Judge late in January, 1918, ordered that the plaintiff be allowed to gather his crops and deposit the proceeds with the clerk of Court, there to be held subject to a settlement of the dispute of the parties. From that order comes this appeal.

1 The necessary inference is that the order has been executed, and the fund is now in the…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kirkland v. Aiken County Board of EducationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API