Legal Opinion

Daniel Paul Austin v. State of Missouri

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 9, 2016No. ED102486Published

1Opinion of the Court

Sn the Missouri Court of Appeals Castern District DIVISION FOUR DANIEL PAUL AUSTIN, ) No. ED102486 ) Appellant, } Appeal from the Circuit Court J of the City of St. Louis VS. ) ) Honorable Elizabeth Hogan STATE OF MISSOURI, ) ) Respondent. ) FILED: February 9, 2016 Introduction Daniel Austin (“Austin”) appeals the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 24,035! motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We cannot determine from the record on appeal whether Austin’s amended motion was timely filed by appointed counsel. Nor can we determine from the record if the motion…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Travis M. Stanley v. State of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
  2. Christopher Gales, Movant/Appellant v. State of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API