Humphress v. Humphress
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
CLAY, Commissioner.
Appellee, the husband, was granted a dL vorce from appellant, his wife, on the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment. She appeals and contends that because ap-*626pellee was really the party at -fault, she should have been allowed alimony.
Appellee is 63 years of age and his former wife is twenty years younger. They were married in 1943. At that time appellee had several grown children by a former marriage, and apparently they played a part in the final breakup of the home. The evidence indicates that both husband and wife were well respected in the community where they lived.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hartstern v. HartsternCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949
- Sullivan v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948
3Cited by7 opinions
- Coleman v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1954
- Eckhoff v. EckhoffCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1951
- Chastain v. ChastainCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1966
- Wilcox v. WilcoxCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1955
- Sears v. SearsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.