Legal Opinion

In re Ah Jow

United States Circuit Court

Decided August 23, 1886PublishedCited by 13 opinions

On Habeas Corpus.

1Opinion of the CourtSawyer, J.

The return to the writ shows that petitioner is in custody in pursuance of a judgment upon a conviction upon a complaint charging him with a public offense, to-wit: “Visiting a room kept, in the city of Modesto, by another, where opium was sold.” The offense for which the petitioner was convicted, and committed as a punishment, is created by section 2 of ordinance INo. 4 of the city of Modesto, which reads as follows:

“Sec. 2. Every person who, in the city of Modesto, opens, keeps, or maintains any room or other place where opium, or any of its preparations, is sold or given away, and eoery…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Garrett v. Moore-McCormack Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. CresseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Bonwell v. Justice CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. City of Carthage v. BlockMissouri Court of Appeals · 1909
  4. Ex parte GlennU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern West Virginia · 1901
  5. Ex Parte BalesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API