Legal Opinion

Bastardo v. Warren

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Decided October 7, 1971No. 69-C-143PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES E. DOYLE, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, adult male laborers, contend that the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution is violated by Section 104.02, Wisconsin Statutes, which provides:

“Every wage paid or agreed to be paid by an employer to any woman or minor employe, except as otherwise provided in section 104.07, shall be no less than a living-wage.”

Briefs have been submitted on these questions:(1) whether the challenged statute is entitled to a presumption of constitutionality, with an accompanying burden upon the plaintiffs to demonstrate…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. (1973), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API