Nikitin v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Blackburn, Chief Judge.
Following his conviction by a jury of sexual battery, two counts of terroristic threats, sexual battery as a lesser included offense of aggravated sexual battery, and aggravated assault, Vladimir Nikitin appeals, arguing that (1) the State committed prosecutorial misconduct and violated Brady v. Maryland 1 by presenting perjured testimony and withholding critical evidence, and (2) his right to effective assistance of counsel was abridged. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.
1. Nikitin maintains that the trial court erred in denying his motion for new trial…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Floyd v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
- Pinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- Saxon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- Verlangieri v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- Ellis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.