Legal Opinion

Ladd v. Cameron

United States Circuit Court

Decided August 15, 1885PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Motion for Preliminary Injunction.

1Opinion of the CourtNixon, J.

The application for a preliminary injunction in this case must be refused. The complainant’s patent has been declared valid, after protracted litigations, by the circuit court of the United States for the Southern district of New York. I fully recognize the propriety of following the decisions of my brethren in other circuits, and in all contests respecting preliminary injunctions. I accept as conclusions such adjudications, unless new evidence is presented of such a character and significance that it would probably, if intro*38duced into the first case, have led to a different decision. See…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bailey Wringing Machine Co. v. AdamsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · 1877

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Philadelphia Trust, Safe-Deposit & Insurance v. Edison Electric Light Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1895
  2. Earl v. Southern Pac. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API