National Fire Insurance v. Pfeil
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtRemy, J.
Action on policy of theft insurance to recover for the loss of an automobile. Trial resulted in a verdict and judgment for plaintiffs, appellees in this court.
On the trial, it became necessary for appellees to prove that one Mannan was the local agent of appellant company at the time of, and following, the loss of the automobile. Mannan was permitted as a witness for appellee to testify that he was such agent. This was not error. Although an agency cannot be proved by declarations of the agent, nevertheless the agent, otherwise a competent witness, may testify to the fact of agency. Hale v.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lawall v. GromanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
- Colchen v. NindeIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Hedekin Land & Improvement Co. v. CampbellIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
- Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
- Hale v. HaleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Zoludow v. Keeshin Motor Express, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1941