Legal Opinion

Strickland v. Strickland

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 20, 1919No. 10157PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Levy and claim; from Gordon superior court—Judge Tarver. August 27, 1918.

1Opinion of the Court

Peb Curiam.

Where a constable is specially deputized by the sheriff and sworn in for the purpose of serving a particular writ, he becomes a de facto deputy sheriff, and service by him is legal. Twiggs v. Hardwick, 61 Ga. 273; Hinton v. Lindsay, 20 Ga. 746; Blount v. Wells, 55 Ga. 282. See also Hartshorn v. Bank, 15 Ga. App. 173 (82 S. E. 805), where it is held that when a constable, although irregularly appointed or qualified as a deputy sheriff, assumes to act as a lawful deputy sheriff, his acts are those of a de facto officer, and therefore legal.

The court did not err in refusing to dismiss…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hinton v. LindsaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1856
  2. Hartshorn v. Bank of GoughCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
  3. Blount v. WellsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875
  4. Twiggs v. HardwickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1878

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bailey v. KennettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API