Strickland v. Strickland
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Levy and claim; from Gordon superior court—Judge Tarver. August 27, 1918.
1Opinion of the Court
Peb Curiam.
Where a constable is specially deputized by the sheriff and sworn in for the purpose of serving a particular writ, he becomes a de facto deputy sheriff, and service by him is legal. Twiggs v. Hardwick, 61 Ga. 273; Hinton v. Lindsay, 20 Ga. 746; Blount v. Wells, 55 Ga. 282. See also Hartshorn v. Bank, 15 Ga. App. 173 (82 S. E. 805), where it is held that when a constable, although irregularly appointed or qualified as a deputy sheriff, assumes to act as a lawful deputy sheriff, his acts are those of a de facto officer, and therefore legal.
The court did not err in refusing to dismiss…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hinton v. LindsaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1856
- Hartshorn v. Bank of GoughCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
- Blount v. WellsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875
- Twiggs v. HardwickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1878
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bailey v. KennettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924