Legal Opinion
United States v. Patrick Cahala
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 4, 1992No. 91-30188UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
953 F.2d 1388
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Patrick CAHALA, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 91-30188.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 10, 1992.*
Decided Feb. 4, 1992.
Before EUGENE A. WRIGHT, CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL and WILLIAM A. NORRIS, Circuit Judges.
1
MEMORANDUM**
2
Patrick Cahala pleaded guilty to burglary…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Hector Francisco MolinaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Leonis Smith, United States of America v. Karen Lynn WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Sandra ClaytonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Frederick E. Hopper v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Hogle (John Craig)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. Kevin Aparicio-LeonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020