Legal Opinion

Ritter v. Brack

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1927PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdgcomb, J.

The above-entitled actions are negligence actions, and arose out of the same accident. To save the time of the court, they were tried together before the same jury. The defendant had a verdict in each case, and has taxed a full bill of costs in both actions. The plaintiffs insist that there was but one trial of an issue of fact, and that a trial fee, therefore, can be taxed in but one action, and not in both. I cannot agree with such contention.

Section 1504 of the Civil Practice Act gives to a party entitled to costs thirty dollars “ for the trial of an issue of fact.” These cases were not…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. A. E. Nettleton Co. v. StoryNew York Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Dame v. MaynardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  3. Drew v. ComstockNew York Supreme Court · 1859
  4. Herzfeld v. ReinachNew York Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Latham v. Bliss & ChildsThe Superior Court of New York City · 1856

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Applications for the Appointment of Guardians of the Property of DohertyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931
  2. Benjamin v. WalchNew York Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API