Ritter v. Brack
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEdgcomb, J.
The above-entitled actions are negligence actions, and arose out of the same accident. To save the time of the court, they were tried together before the same jury. The defendant had a verdict in each case, and has taxed a full bill of costs in both actions. The plaintiffs insist that there was but one trial of an issue of fact, and that a trial fee, therefore, can be taxed in but one action, and not in both. I cannot agree with such contention.
Section 1504 of the Civil Practice Act gives to a party entitled to costs thirty dollars “ for the trial of an issue of fact.” These cases were not…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- A. E. Nettleton Co. v. StoryNew York Supreme Court · 1923
- Dame v. MaynardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
- Drew v. ComstockNew York Supreme Court · 1859
- Herzfeld v. ReinachNew York Supreme Court · 1899
- Latham v. Bliss & ChildsThe Superior Court of New York City · 1856
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re the Applications for the Appointment of Guardians of the Property of DohertyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931
- Benjamin v. WalchNew York Supreme Court · 1936