Legal Opinion

Healy v. Defiance City Bank

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 7, 1911No. Gen. No. 16,967Published

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. George A. Dupuy, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1910. Certiorari denied by Supreme Court (making opinion final).

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clark

The appellees in this case insist that the receiver may not maintain this suit because, as they assert, he does not represent and cannot have adjudicated the rights of stockholders, individually as such, and may not have a decree canceling the stock, as prayed for in his bill. We think their objection comes too late. The decree of the court below is in their favor; they have filed no cross errors, and are asking the court, as we understand it, to affirm the decree so entered below. In our judgment, it would have been much better if the court, instead of authorizing the receiver to bring an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. N.Y. N.H.R.R. Co. v. . SchuylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  2. Tome v. Parkersburg Branch RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1873
  3. Bruff v. . MaliNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  4. Rice v. GilbertIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  5. First National Bank v. DrewIllinois Supreme Court · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API