Legal Opinion
Clintec Nutrition Co. v. Baxa Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided August 21, 1997No. 94 C 7050PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BUCKLO, District Judge.
Clintec Nutrition Company1 (“Clintec”) sued Baxa Corporation (“Baxa”) for patent infringement, literally and under the doctrine of equivalents. Baxa moved for summary judgment. Clintec moved for summary judgment with respect to literal infringement of claim 40. Baxa moved for cross-summary judgment with respect to literal infringement of claim 40. For the following reasons, Baxa’s summary judgment motion and cross-summary judgment motion' are granted. Clintec’s cross-summary judgment motion is denied.
BACKGROUND
Clintec owns U.S. Patent No.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- United States v. James C. DunkelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Immunex Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
- Pirelli Cable Corp. v. Ciena Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1998
- RLP Ventures, LLC v. Panini America, Inc., Trademark Trial and Appeal Board2023