Commonwealth v. Wilson
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtHanlon, J.
After a jury-waived trial in the District Court, the defendant was convicted of operating a motor vehicle after his license or right to operate had been suspended for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor (OUI). See G. L. c. 90, § 23, third par. He appeals, arguing that his motion for a required finding of not guilty was wrongfully denied because the Commonwealth failed to prove that he had notice that his license had been suspended. We affirm.
At trial, the Commonwealth called one witness and offered one exhibit; the underlying facts are not in dispute.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. BroceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Commonwealth v. BorisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Commonwealth v. NormanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2015
- Commonwealth v. Ubeira-GonzalezMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2015
3Cited by2 opinions
- Commonwealth v. CaldwellMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2019
- Commonwealth v. CuevaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2019