Legal Opinion

Federal Life & Casualty Co. v. Robinson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 27, 1938No. 6 Div. 221PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOULDIN, Justice.

The decision of the Court of Appeals, 178 So. 549, here for review, is so important in the law of insurance that this court deems it proper to give a definite expression of our views.

It appears from the decision under review that plaintiff held a policy of health insurance, the coverage of which included “hernia.” A case of hernia developed, and a claim for loss was duly presented, adjusted, and paid.

The insurer, not willing longer to carry the risk for hernia, made known a purpose to exercise its option to cancel the policy unless the insured execute an agreement to become a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Satterfield v. Fidelity Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  2. Norris v. New England Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  3. Pan Americam Life Ins. Co. v. CarterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  4. Federal Life & Casualty Co. v. RobinsonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1937
  5. Reliance Life Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh v. LowrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
  2. Alldredge v. Security Life Trust CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  3. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. DeanDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1970
  4. Brittain v. Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaAlabama Court of Appeals · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API