Legal Opinion

New York Life Insurance v. Bradford

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 13, 1937No. 25902PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSutton, J.

To paragraph 6 of the petition, alleging that due proof of disability had been furnished, the defendant demurred on the ground that such statement was a mere conclusion without any allegation as to what was contained in the proof or to whom made. The plaintiff then amended by setting out that the defendant had subsequently denied his claim, although by letter to the defendant, dated January 31, 1935, the plaintiff had insisted that he was still totally and permanently disabled, and offered to submit to examination by physicians and furnish any further information that might be required; and…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. City of Columbus v. AnglinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Cato v. Ætna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  3. Harp v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  4. Askew v. AmosSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
  5. New York Life Insurance v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Wilson v. BonnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  2. Munford, Inc. v. AnglinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  3. HOMASOTE COMPANY v. StanleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  4. Simmons v. BeattyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
  5. Smith v. GodfreyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API