Legal Opinion

Clark v. Puls

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 4, 1946No. 5699Published

1Opinion

On Motion for Rehearing.

2Per curiam

In their motion for rehearing, appellees contend that instead of rendering judgment for appellant on the reversal of this cause, this Court should have remanded the case ■ for another trial. In support of their contention they urge that their original petition, on which the suit was tried and which was filed within two years from the date of the sale of the property, contains a tender of the amount required under Article 7283, Vernon’s Annotated Civil Statutes, to redeem their property.

Article 7283 pertains to summary sales by the tax collector and is not applicable…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of El Paso v. FortiTexas Supreme Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API