Legal Opinion

In re McCormick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 7, 1909PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Order Confirming Report of Referee. Action by the Typothetæ of the City of New York against Typographical Union No. 6 and others. In the matter of the punishment of Patrick H. McCormick and others for criminal contempt for violating an injunction order. From an order confirming a referee’s report, certain defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

The following is the opinion of Wiener, Referee:

This proceeding was instituted to punish the respondents for a criminal contempt, under section 8 of the Code of Civil Procedure, for willful disobedience of an injunction order granted in the action of the Typothetse of the City of New York against Typographical Union No. 6 and others, whereby the union and its officers, members, agents, servants, and associates, as well as the defendant individually named, were enjoined and restrained from inducing or coercing, or attempting to induce or coerce, by any species of intimidation, threats, force,-…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. The People Ex Rel. Negus v. . DwyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  2. New York and Brooklyn Ferry Company v. . MooreNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. Potter v. LowNew York Supreme Court · 1858
  4. Van Valkenburgh v. DoolittleNew York Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Phillips Sheet & Tin Plate Co. v. Amalgamated Ass'n of Iron, Steel & Tin WorkersDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1913
  2. Walters v. ReinhoudtNew York Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API