Legal Opinion
Thompson v. Hanson
Washington Supreme Court
Decided October 22, 2009No. 81311-6PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
219 P.3d 659 (2009)
Chad A. THOMPSON, a single person; and Heather M. Thompson, a single person, Respondents,
v.
Paul V. HANSON and Jeannine Hanson, husband and wife and individually, and the marital community composed thereof, Petitioners.
No. 81311-6.
Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
Argued June 25, 2009.
Decided October 22, 2009.
Chase Christian Alvord, Tousley Brain Stephens PLLC, Seattle, WA, for Petitioners.
Douglas Richard Cloud, Law Office of Douglas Cloud, Tacoma, WA, for Respondents.
OWENS, J.
¶ 1 Under Washington's Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (UFTA), chapter 19.40 RCW, creditors have…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Scholes v. LehmannCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Warfield v. ByronCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- State v. NeherWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- Philippides v. BernardWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- Philippides v. BernardWashington Supreme Court · 2004
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Executive Benefits Insurance Agency v. ArkisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- DZ Bank AG Deutsche Zentral-Genossenschaft Bank v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Northgate Ventures Llc v. Geoffrey H. Garrett PllcCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- Rubenstein v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2010
- Something Sweet v. Nick-N-Willy's FranchiseCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.