Legal Opinion

Kimble v. Pepsi-Cola General Bottlers

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 3, 1995No. C-940169PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Painter, Judge.

This litigation arose out of an automobile accident involving an employee of the defendan1>appellee, Pepsi-Cola General Bottlers (“Pepsi-Cola”), and Vincent and Juanita Kimble (“the Kimbles”). The Kimbles sued Pepsi-Cola for damages under a theory of respondeat superior. Both the Kimbles and Pepsi-Cola moved for summary judgment, and the trial court granted summary judgment to Pepsi-Cola. The Kimbles then moved for leave to add the employee, a Mr. Nolte, as a defendant, and the trial court denied the motion. The Kimbles assign as error both rulings of the trial court.

The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Beavercreek Local Schools v. Basic, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Columbus Board of Education v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Travelers Fire Ins. v. Louis G. Freeman Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1957

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. Lovell, Ca2006-06-138 (8-27-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Pottorf v. SellOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Monahan v. Duke Realty Corp., C-070318 (3-14-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API