Kimble v. Pepsi-Cola General Bottlers
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Painter, Judge.
This litigation arose out of an automobile accident involving an employee of the defendan1>appellee, Pepsi-Cola General Bottlers (“Pepsi-Cola”), and Vincent and Juanita Kimble (“the Kimbles”). The Kimbles sued Pepsi-Cola for damages under a theory of respondeat superior. Both the Kimbles and Pepsi-Cola moved for summary judgment, and the trial court granted summary judgment to Pepsi-Cola. The Kimbles then moved for leave to add the employee, a Mr. Nolte, as a defendant, and the trial court denied the motion. The Kimbles assign as error both rulings of the trial court.
The…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Beavercreek Local Schools v. Basic, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1991
- Columbus Board of Education v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
- Travelers Fire Ins. v. Louis G. Freeman Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1957
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. Lovell, Ca2006-06-138 (8-27-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Pottorf v. SellOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
- Monahan v. Duke Realty Corp., C-070318 (3-14-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008