Demelus v. King Motor Co. of Fort Lauderdale
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtPolen, J.
The appellant, Onondieu Demelus (“De-melus”), appeals the trial court’s order granting summary judgment for King Motor Company of Fort Lauderdale (“King Motor”). This appeal addresses whether it was legally foreseeable that a vehicle would be stolen from King Motor’s premises and cause injury to a third party. We conclude that the manner of theft was not legally foreseeable and affirm.
King Motor is an automobile dealership that, at the time of the relevant facts, was located on East Sunrise Boulevard in Fort Lauderdale. Eight automobile franchises were located on King Motor’s premises. The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McCain v. Florida Power CorporationSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
- The Florida Bar v. GreeneSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
- Vining v. Avis Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1977
- Aurbach v. GallinaSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- Whitt v. SilvermanSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Jackson Hewitt, Inc. v. KamanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- Bongiorno v. Americorp, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- Gloria Lee v. The Clorox International CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
- Lee v. Clorox International Co.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 2010
- Williams v. MARINEMAX OF CENTRAL FLORIDA LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.