William H. Rose & Co. v. Cawood
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.
May 23,1929, defendant gave plaintiff an order to purchase for him 1,000 shares of Bach Airplane Corporation stock, and advanced $500 thereon. Plaintiff made the purchase and notified defendant May 28th. June 27th, it wrote defendant that it had sold 200 shares of the stock for his account and risk. The reason for the sale was not shown, and it is not claimed to have been in foreclosure of the. pledge. July 2d, it wrote him that it was holding for his account 1,000 shares on which there was no delivery instruction, asked him how he wanted the stock handled, stated that unless it heard from…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Taussig v. . HartNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Austin v. HaydenMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Crowl v. GoodenbergerMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Shiel v. StonehamAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1912
- Lipps v. LangAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.