Kennedy v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a decree abating a common nuisance and closing the premises, where the' nuisance was maintained for a period of one year, under section 22 of title 2 of the National Prohibition Act (41 Stat. 314 [Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1923, § 10138i/2k]). The sufficiency of tie testimony to support the decree is the only question presented for our consideration. As appears from the opinion of the court below, it was stipulated at the trial that all evidence given on the trial of a criminal action between the same parties should be considered as given on the trial…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. FinnertyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
- Shore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1922
- Marshallo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Chesebrough Mfg. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1926
- United States v. Carstens Packing Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1931
- Daniel Jang v. Sagicor Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- United States v. De NeenDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1933
- United States v. VareleDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1930