Legal Opinion

Colarusso v. Bahto

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 22, 1942PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Perskie, J.

The basic question requiring decision, on the facts of this workmen’s compensation case, is whether, as claimed by the employer and employee, a wrong basis or method was employed in determining the question of compensable disability awarded the employee.

On May 25th, 1938, Prank Colarusso, hereafter referred to as petitioner, a laborer, 29 years of age, was employed as a general helper by Sam Bahto, trading as Liberty Cleaners and Dyers, hereafter referred to as respondent. While so employed, petitioner sustained an accident which coneededly…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sigley v. Marathon Razor Blade Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
  2. P. Bronstein Co., Inc. v. HoffmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
  3. Ruoff v. BlasiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
  4. Ruoff v. BlasiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tucker v. Central Paper Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
  2. Department of Correction v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
  3. Department of Correction v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API